Esta web utiliza cookies propias y de terceros que nos permiten optimizar tu experiencia en el sitio web, evaluar su rendimiento, generar estadísticas de uso y mejorar y añadir nuevas funcionalidades. Mediante el análisis de tus hábitos de navegación podemos mostrar contenidos más relevantes y medir las interacciones con la web.
Puede obtener más información aquí.

Avanzado
Artículos
Portada

OPENING ARGUMENT OF HENRY P. MOULTON, ESQ. AND TESTIMONY OF IBD

GEORGE DEXTER ROBINSON / HENRY PERCY MOULT
NABU PRESS
01 / 2010
9781142928131
Inglés

Sinopsis

This historical record presents the arguments and testimonies surrounding a proposed division of the town of Beverly, Massachusetts, in 1890. The book features the opening argument of Henry P. Moulton, Esq., the testimony of petitioners and remonstrants, and the closing argument of Hon. George D. Robinson, all delivered before the Legislative Committee on Towns. It offers a detailed look into the local politics and governance of a late 19th-century New England town, showcasing the legal and civic processes involved in addressing significant community issues. Readers interested in local history, legal proceedings, and the dynamics of town governance will find this a valuable resource. The arguments presented provide insights into the concerns and perspectives of the residents of Beverly at the time, offering a compelling snapshot of a community grappling with change.This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

PVP
26,21€